Skip to content
Bitpute
ToolsModelsGPUsCloudLearn

PC compatibility

Which GPUs fit
your actual build?

Enter your CPU, RAM, motherboard and PSU. We run a real power budget — not just “does the wattage look big enough” — and tell you which cards drop in cleanly, which are tight, and which need a server chassis.

Real power budget

CPU load + GPU + rig baseline, sized to 70% PSU load.

Connectors & class

Flags 12VHPWR and datacenter-only cards honestly.

RAM & PCIe

System RAM for loading, PCIe gen for bandwidth.

Your buildlive

Any modern ×16 slot takes any card — gen affects bandwidth, ITX affects clearance.

Power budget — top pick W draw / W PSU
GPU CPU Rest of system Recommended PSU

Your GPU shortlist

How we check

Precision, not a wattage glance.

Power budget

Draw = GPU + CPU peak + 90 W baseline (board, RAM, drives, fans). Recommended PSU sizes that to ~70% load for efficiency and transient spikes, then takes the higher of that and the card's vendor rating.

Class & connectors

Datacenter cards (A100, L40S, H100, H200) are passively cooled server parts — flagged server-only, not "compatible." Each card lists its power connector so you can check your PSU has it.

RAM & PCIe

System RAM should meet or beat the card's VRAM to load models comfortably. Any ×16 slot fits any card; PCIe gen only changes transfer bandwidth, so it's a note, never a blocker.

Now check what models it runs →

Fits the build — but is it the right buy?

Compatible is step one.

A card that fits your PSU still has to fit your models and your budget. The Workspace ranks the ones that do, then calls buy-vs-rent.

Evidence & method

How this calculation works

Checks a model's estimated memory footprint against your PC's GPU and system memory to see whether it runs, and how.

Data sources

  • NVIDIA, AMD & Intel GPU documentation
  • Hugging Face model cards
  • Official model papers
  • Bitpute Methodology

Assumptions

  • Weights = parameters × bits-per-weight ÷ 8
  • Runtime overhead = 0.75 GB + 5% of weights (CUDA context, allocator, buffers)
  • Recommended VRAM = total × 1.10 (10% headroom)
  • Usable VRAM = card capacity × 0.95
  • KV cache counted only when the model architecture is known; when applied, batch size 1, FP16 KV, context as entered
  • Single GPU, inference workload

Limitations

  • Actual VRAM varies by framework (PyTorch, llama.cpp, vLLM, TGI), driver/CUDA version and OS
  • Quantization implementations differ; real bits-per-weight can vary from the nominal value
  • When architecture is unknown the KV cache is omitted, so long-context use will exceed the estimate
  • Estimates are for planning and comparison, not a guarantee

Data status: Hardware specs — vendor documentation. Model metadata — community model cards, not independently verified.

Why does this estimate differ from other calculators?
  • Different footprint formulas and rounding
  • Different KV-cache assumptions (batch, context, precision)
  • Framework and inference-engine differences
  • Reserved and fragmented VRAM
  • Driver and CUDA overhead
  • Precision and quantization choices